April 2007 Edition
Jehangir Rashid
Though most people are in favour of revocation of the AFSPA, they are not too enthusiastic about handing over law and order to the local police. They say that this may result in a situation where unlimited powers are given to the police, which they are most likely to misuse. A section of people feel that the demand for the revocation of the AFSPA by PDP is nothing but an election ploy (the elections for the state assembly are due to be held next year). When Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, patron of PDP, was chairman of the unified command for three years he never raised the issue. People say since the PDP could not disband the SOG of the police, the party is on the lookout for fresh issues to tap for the ensuing assembly elections. Meanwhile, according to CPI (M) state secretary Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, the demand for the AFSPA’s revocation is now part of a campaign. He said that political parties have been making the right moves by asking for revocation and this would mobilise public support. “Governor Lt. Gen (Retd) SK Sinha, while addressing legislators on the first day of the Budget session on January 8, accepted that the security situation in the country needs to be reviewed. If the governor himself says the security situation needs to be reviewed then I believe that the AFSPA should not be imposed,” said Tarigami. He also said that the time has come when the AFSPA along with the Disturbed Areas Act (DAA) should be revoked. “The demand of revocation by the PDP is part of a campaign launched for revocation of the Acts and we will try our best to mobilise public support. Our party people in Parliament will raise this issue. We will ensure that Parliament is taken into confidence so that AFSPA and DAA are revoked,” said Tarigami. National Conference (NC) and PDP leaders have been blaming each other for trying to acquire political mileage over revocation of the AFSPA and DAA. The NC leaders say that the PDP did not talk about the issue when it was in power, and the PDP blames the NC for creation of the SOG, saying that it was during the NC’s rule that the group came into existence creating several problems.
|
Want to give feedback on this article |
Disclaimer
The views expressed here are strictly personal and civilsocietyonline.com does not necessarily subscribe to them. We shall endeavour to upload/publish as many of the comments that are submitted as possible within a reasonable span of time, but we do not guarantee that all comments that are submitted will be uploaded/published. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other members; have obscene, unlawful, defamatory, libellous, hateful, or otherwise objectionable content; or have spam, commercial or advertising content or links are liable to be removed by the editors. We also reserve the right to edit the comments that do get published. Please do not post any private information unless you want it to be available publicly.
Your Feedback on this story...
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
     
